China’s urbanization plan for the next five years

China’s urbanization plan for the next five years is primarily guided by the 14th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development (2021-2025) and a more specific five-year action plan on people-centered new urbanization released by the State Council in July 2024. While the 14th Five-Year Plan period concludes at the end of 2025, the principles and goals set out in these documents will continue to shape China’s urbanization strategy. The 15th Five-Year Plan will then outline the specific goals for 2026-2030, but details are not fully released yet.

Overall Goals and Philosophy:

– People-Centered New Urbanization: This is the overarching principle, focusing on improving the quality of life for urban residents, especially rural migrants. The goal is not just about increasing the urban population but ensuring all residents genuinely benefit from urbanization.

– Boosting Domestic Demand: Urbanization is seen as a crucial driver for expanding domestic consumption and promoting economic growth and industrial upgrades.

– High-Quality Development: Shifting focus from rapid growth to sustainable, inclusive, and green urbanization.

Key Specific Targets and Measures:

– Increasing Urbanization Rate:

The 14th Five-Year Plan sets a target urbanization rate of 65% by 2025 (measured by permanent population living in cities).

The five-year action plan (released July 2024) aims to raise the percentage of permanent urban residents to nearly 70% within five years (implying a goal around 2029).

Hukou System Reform (Household Registration):

– Lifting Restrictions: Restrictions on household registration (hukou) will be eliminated in cities with a permanent urban population of fewer than 3 million.

– Relaxing Restrictions: Requirements for hukou in cities with a permanent population of between 3 million and 5 million will be comprehensively relaxed.

– Encouraging Migrants in Megacities: Large cities (over 5 million people) are encouraged to abolish annual hukou caps and allow more migrants who meet certain requirements to acquire local residency permits.

Equal Access to Public Services: All urban residents, regardless of their hukou status (including migrant workers who have held stable jobs or lived in cities for at least six months), will gain full access to basic urban public services, including education, health care, and social welfare programs. This aims to reduce disparities between registered and non-registered residents.

Spatial Layout and Urban Development:

– City Clusters and Metropolitan Areas: Emphasis on strengthening the leading, demonstrating, and radiating role of central cities to promote the formation of modern metropolitan areas and urban clusters. This includes fostering distinctive and advantageous industrial clusters.

– Avoiding Urban Sprawl: The plan directs the development of more centralized cities and avoiding unchecked urban sprawl.

– Urban Renewal and Smart Cities: Accelerating urban renewal projects to develop “human-centric,” livable, resilient, and smart cities. This includes renovating old neighborhoods, improving urban drainage and flood control, and upgrading urban infrastructure like underground pipelines and road networks.

– “15-Minute Community Living Circles”: Promoting the development of communities where essential services (housing, education, healthcare, public transport, shops) are accessible within a 15-minute walk.

Rural-Urban Integration:

– Strengthening the systems and mechanisms of integrated urban-rural development.

– Protecting rural residents’ land rights and interests even if they switch to urban residency, to remove disincentives for migration.

– Promoting rural revitalization to balance development between urban and rural areas.

– Fiscal and Employment Support:

– Increased central fiscal support for affordable rental housing and urban infrastructure upgrading.

– Measures to enhance employment opportunities for rural migrant workers, including expanding employment channels, optimizing services, enhancing skills training, and safeguarding their rights.

This comprehensive plan reflects China’s ongoing shift towards a more balanced, high-quality urbanization model, addressing both economic growth needs and social equity concerns.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/2147681399062551/?cft[0]=AZVAo37h84IVJb9TyDj8WySo3BucbISS2LuFYeBoPKx2p1vZA3RnN8tSzsR5X-X-550Z7glDJ2ZtGmYjD9dpYsY34Aik9TpaWx1aOLdDGwDL6FTyEB8t01qveOXERgLJ0ciO4zDxQu4szvWiOh6XfeYqlgbASz8QgRF0SEij-Quxaw&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

China’s Revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law

China’s Revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law Lowers Age for Minor Detention to 14

On June 27, 2025, the 16th session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress voted to adopt the newly revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law, which will come into effect on January 1, 2026.

A significant and highly anticipated amendment in this revision is the lowering of the age for detaining minors in specific circumstances to 14 years old. This means that minors aged 14 but under 18, if they commit certain illegal acts stipulated by the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, may face administrative detention.

China’s Revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law Lowers Age for Minor Detention to 14

On June 27, 2025, the 16th session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress voted to adopt the newly revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law, which will come into effect on January 1, 2026.

A significant and highly anticipated amendment in this revision is the lowering of the age for detaining minors in specific circumstances to 14 years old. This means that minors aged 14 but under 18, if they commit certain illegal acts stipulated by the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, may face administrative detention.

Revision Background and Controversy

This revision aims to adapt to new situations and problems in social development, better maintain public security, and protect citizens’ legitimate rights and interests. However, lowering the age for minor detention to 14 had previously sparked widespread discussion and controversy in society.

Supporters argue that this move will help to:

Curb low-age crime and minor illegal acts: In recent years, cases of severe illegal and criminal acts committed by young minors have attracted widespread public attention, with existing laws seen as insufficient in their deterrence. Lowering the detention age helps to fill this gap and enhance the deterrent effect of the law.

Education and correction: Through appropriate administrative detention, minors who commit illegal acts can promptly recognize their mistakes, receive education and correction, and prevent them from going further astray.

Respond to social concerns: This move also responds to public calls for strengthening the punishment of illegal acts by minors.

Opponents and those with concerns primarily focus on:

Impact on minors’ physical and mental health: Premature administrative detention may have negative impacts on minors’ physical and mental health, potentially even leading them deeper into crime.

Lack of alternative educational measures: Concerns exist about whether sufficient and comprehensive alternative measures, primarily focused on education and correction, are in place alongside the lowered detention age to ensure minors receive effective help rather than simple punishment.

Preventing “detain and forget”: There are worries that administrative detention might become a simple “detain and forget” approach, lacking follow-up psychological counseling, educational correction, and reintegration support.

Impact of the Law’s Implementation

After the implementation of the new Public Security Administration Punishment Law, the following impacts are anticipated:

– Regulation of minor illegal acts will become stricter, especially for those with severe circumstances or who are repeat offenders at a young age.

– Law enforcement agencies will have greater discretion in handling cases involving minors, while also needing to pay more attention to protecting minors’ rights and considering their unique circumstances.

– The responsibility of various sectors of society, particularly families, schools, and communities, in guiding and educating minors will become more prominent.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid02MzrACBBEMQPCoT2MbVGDcXCWBZuADprzPyUv7fnytS4Drcb3MbQ2u6FuYVdGj4Rgl?cft[0]=AZWUA-uBFA9Cx8hm26CSaakBmeqfT3nByHsvWUzoslQJme9UYr7M-YyxO1YuCZ9GFujO_faxHPFwbAyJX1Td8t3IJfBZ0SvYT2SW39KxMTyXe_WnbBkdg-mLm_nNbagGT-lGWooABYkG6ZbGPvVdrrtk&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

China’s Strategic Reorientation of Higher Education: Engineering the Future Workforce

China’s Strategic Reorientation of Higher Education: Engineering the Future Workforce

Introduction

China is executing a deliberate and unprecedented national strategy to channel its youth into engineering and high-tech fields, reshaping its higher education system to meet ambitious technological and economic goals. This state-driven initiative combines historical precedents with modern policy tools to cultivate a workforce capable of advancing China’s position in strategic industries.

The Scale of China’s Engineering Focus

In 2022, 36% of all Chinese undergraduates—approximately 1.6 million students—enrolled in engineering programs, a notable increase from 32% in 2010. This emphasis on technical education starkly contrasts with Western nations like the U.S. and U.K., where only about 5% of undergraduates pursue engineering degrees. The disparity underscores China’s targeted approach to building human capital in STEM fields.

Government Control and Historical Foundations

China’s higher education system remains tightly controlled by the state, with university leaders serving as civil servants and institutions relying primarily on government funding. This structure enables rapid reallocation of resources to align with national priorities. The current push mirrors strategies from the early decades of the People’s Republic, when students were steered toward utilitarian disciplines like mining and agriculture to fuel industrialization.

Drivers of the Shift

The reorientation is propelled by both top-down policy mandates and bottom-up economic pressures. With youth unemployment reaching 14.9%, students and families increasingly view engineering as a safer career path. Meanwhile, the government is actively restructuring degree programs to address technological bottlenecks and strategic industries, exemplified by a 2023 “emergency mechanism” to fast-track new degrees in critical fields.

The Rise of “New Engineering” Degrees

Chinese universities have launched a wave of specialized engineering programs, including over 600 institutions now offering undergraduate degrees in artificial intelligence. Other prioritized areas include low-altitude aviation technologies (e.g., drones) and advanced medical device manufacturing. These programs are designed to directly support industries identified as vital to China’s technological self-sufficiency and global competitiveness.

The Decline of the Humanities

This engineering focus has a deliberate counterpart: the marginalization of humanities and certain social sciences, termed the “illiberal arts” in policy circles. Over the past five years, more than 5,000 humanities programs have been discontinued nationwide. Elite institutions like Fudan University are reducing their share of humanities students from 30-40% to just 20%, reflecting a broader devaluation of disciplines perceived as non-essential to immediate economic objectives.

Long-Term Implications and Trade-offs

While this strategy may accelerate technological advancement, it raises critical questions about the societal role of broader liberal arts education. The podcast prompts reflection on potential losses in critical thinking, adaptability, and cultural discourse—qualities traditionally nurtured by humanities. The long-term resilience of a society heavily skewed toward technical training remains untested, particularly as global challenges increasingly demand interdisciplinary solutions.

Conclusion

China’s educational restructuring represents a bold experiment in human capital development, prioritizing rapid technological gains over traditional academic diversity. The outcomes will not only shape China’s innovation capacity but also offer lessons—and cautions—for other nations navigating the balance between economic pragmatism and intellectual pluralism. As this strategy unfolds, its ultimate success may hinge on whether China can maintain societal dynamism while pursuing its ambitious engineering-led development model.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1233729164695462/?cft[0]=AZUaMcnlzLCnxF1wumEvZgou2nlNvRrvi6gVSTbs6SgOeWmbSzdh8uUYt68l7nBUQ1VUQ8Un0Sr6lo4eJd-uay8pThYpY567eiaHKQtdPW_UAOpKZQBGIfU-7oOesAdWXvQJMVrMzTvHPK5vHmyjL4OefQ-keqbvznEJ5oFjWlz_UA&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

Made in China 2025 status

As of mid-2025, Made in China 2025 (MIC2025) has largely achieved many of its initial objectives and has significantly reshaped China’s industrial landscape, though with mixed results and ongoing challenges. While the explicit term “Made in China 2025” has been de-emphasized in official communications since around 2018 due to international scrutiny, its core ambitions and strategies remain the driving force behind China’s industrial policy.

Here’s a summary of its performance:

Key Achievements:

Significant Industrial Upgrading: China has undeniably moved up the manufacturing value chain. It has transitioned from being primarily a producer of low-cost goods to a major player in advanced manufacturing.

Reduced Import Dependencies: China has made substantial progress in reducing its reliance on foreign technology and components in many areas. Strategies like requiring localization of high-tech production and acquiring foreign companies have contributed to this. This has led to a decrease in the number of products China sourced mainly from the US and/or EU.

Global Leadership in Key Sectors: China has achieved global competitiveness and even dominance in several of the ten targeted sectors, particularly:

Electric Vehicles (EVs): China accounts for the lion’s share of global EV production and is a leader in battery manufacturing.

Solar Panels: China dominates solar module production.

High-Speed Rail: China’s high-speed rail network and technology are world-leading.

Telecommunications (e.g., 5G): China has made significant strides in 5G technology and related infrastructure.

Drones and some clean technologies.

Increased Innovation and R&D: The policy has spurred increased R&D investment and fostered a more innovation-driven manufacturing ecosystem. China has expanded its industrial and technological footprint amid global shifts.

Development of Domestic Champions: Many Chinese companies have grown into formidable players globally, competing with established foreign firms in their respective high-tech sectors.

Standard Setting Influence: Beijing is emerging as a major player in standard-setting for new technologies, which could give it considerable control over emerging markets.

Areas with Mixed Success or Ongoing Challenges:

Continued Dependencies in High-End Technologies: While overall import dependencies have decreased, China still faces significant reliance on foreign companies for the most cutting-edge technologies, such as:

Advanced Semiconductors: Despite massive investment, China still lags behind global leaders in designing and manufacturing the most advanced chips. This remains a critical “chokepoint.”

High-End Machine Tools and Machinery: Sophisticated industrial machinery often still relies on foreign technology.

Commercial Aircraft: China is still developing its own commercial aircraft and is dependent on foreign suppliers for many critical components.

Biopharmaceuticals and High-Performance Medical Devices: While progress is being made, foreign incumbents often maintain a commanding lead in premium medical tech and specialized drugs.

Market Distortions and Overcapacity: The heavy state subsidies and directed investment have led to concerns about market distortions, unfair competition, and, in some sectors, significant overcapacity. This can result in waste, inefficiency, and pressure on global prices.

Quality and Brand Recognition: While Chinese firms are competitive on price and volume in many areas, they sometimes still lag behind Western counterparts in international brand recognition and control over high-margin segments.

Economic Costs: The success has come with economic costs, including resource misallocation and propping up less competitive firms.

Evolving Strategy (“Made in China 2.0”):

As of 2025, the principles of MIC2025 are deeply embedded in China’s broader economic strategy, often referred to as a “Made in China 2.0” phase. This new phase is characterized by:

AI-augmented and Green-energy-powered transformation: A strong emphasis on integrating AI, advanced computing, and green technologies across industries.

Self-reliance oriented: The push for technological self-sufficiency has intensified, especially given geopolitical tensions and supply chain fragmentation.

Broader Industrial Greatness: The ambition has expanded beyond the initial ten sectors to encompass a comprehensive strengthening of China’s industrial base across all sectors and positions in the value chain. “New productive forces” and cross-sectoral technologies like AI, 5G, and quantum technology are now central to policymaking.

In conclusion, “Made in China 2025” has been remarkably effective in accelerating China’s industrial upgrading and reducing its technological vulnerabilities in many key areas. While some ambitious targets for 2025 in the most advanced sectors may not have been fully met, the policy has undeniably set China on a path to become a global manufacturing and technological superpower, a trajectory that continues well beyond 2025. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid0eJiHUeX8UfLEyFZq5pXggvu4GqwxCorHBdqwuEPgfDA6h4sf6wMhBSFsomwYde8Xl?__cft__[0]=AZX92N4cGrtyT6-YvJvklebCJ04wGAAYvHv7wQT9sGbHdZLWs-1DSxFH5nZnSFQr0TNeEbhVz8wBLxkklx3rZMVbFuIt3hbZC1iCqvjN0PR7TbsmZ36TQvsEPXX8Wr9PeAdbMAzJzqoy4TjBT-xZjMud&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

The Chinese people must hold their rice bowls firmly in their own hands

The statement, “The Chinese people must hold their rice bowls firmly in their own hands” (“中国人要把饭碗端在自己手里”) is a significant discourse that profoundly reflects the high importance the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government place on national food security. It is one of General Secretary Xi’s important thoughts on governance.

The Chinese government consistently adheres to a people-centered development philosophy. They ensure national food security and social stability through a series of measures, including implementing the rural revitalization strategy, advancing agricultural modernization, and safeguarding grain production.

China has the capability and the determination to ensure the food supply for its 1.4 billion people. This is a significant advantage of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics and a vivid demonstration of the Chinese government’s commitment to seeking happiness for its people and rejuvenation for the nation under the leadership of the Communist Party of China. China will continue to unswervingly follow the path of food security with Chinese characteristics, ensuring that the “rice bowls” of the Chinese people are held firmly in their own hands. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1723557791580582/?__cft__[0]=AZVx-vTTIoUbWigWOZDWxP_xEAB0mErke4vcPKzDQcu3XD2J7rABbvyCP5N6pTjeWzFR-qSI4O-_gXgbRX1ePu8IZKG6kZUC-UbUoaGtT_x7tfJkIZMN_wQSZsW8x58ClZjNLp1aY66HyRjoJra160bXeL62zZktsLJalhvFC_Xicg&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

China will implement tax cuts for small businesses and expanded benefits for retirees

In July 2025, China will implement tax cuts for small businesses and expanded benefits for retirees, aiming to stimulate economic growth, support SMEs, and strengthen social welfare. This report analyzes the expected policy changes, their sectoral impacts, and broader economic implications.

1. Key Policy Measures

A. Tax Reforms for Small Businesses

– Reduced VAT & Corporate Taxes: Further cuts for eligible SMEs to ease financial burdens.

Simplified Compliance: Streamlined tax filings to reduce administrative costs.

– Extended Incentives: Possible prolongation of social insurance contribution discounts.

B. Enhanced Retiree Benefits

– Pension Increases: Adjustments tied to wage growth and inflation.

– Healthcare Expansion: Higher insurance reimbursements for elderly care.

– Senior Care Subsidies: Support for community-based eldercare services.

2. Sectoral and Demographic Impact Analysis

A. Small Business Reforms: Winners & Challenges

Most Benefited Sectors:

– Retail & Hospitality – Lower taxes improve margins for small shops, restaurants.

– E-commerce & Tech SMEs – Freed-up capital for digital upgrades and R&D.

– Light Manufacturing – Helps offset rising operational costs.

Key Challenges:

– Rural SMEs may lag in accessing benefits due to uneven policy implementation.

– Short-term relief may not fully address long-term financing needs.

Demographic Effects:

– Young Entrepreneurs: Easier tax rules could spur startups.

– Low-Wage Workers: Improved SME stability may support job security.

B. Retiree Benefits: Economic & Social Ripple Effects

Urban vs. Rural Impact:

– Urban Retirees: Faster pension hikes due to better fiscal infrastructure.

– Rural Retirees: Greater gains from healthcare expansions if local clinics are funded.

Healthcare & Consumption Shifts:

– Pharma & Eldercare Services: Rising demand for chronic disease treatments.

– Domestic Tourism & Retail: Retirees with higher pensions may spend more.

Broader Economic Effects:

– Reduces financial pressure on working-age families supporting elderly relatives.

– Stimulates domestic consumption, partially offsetting export slowdowns.

3. Macroeconomic Implications

– Fiscal Trade-offs: Tax cuts may strain local budgets, requiring central transfers.

– Inflation Risks: Increased retiree spending could push prices in healthcare/eldercare.

– Social Stability: Policies may ease aging-population discontent but require sustainable funding.

4. Investment & Strategic Opportunities

– Healthcare & Insurance: Growth in private pensions, eldercare, and medical devices.

– FinTech: Digital tax solutions for SMEs and pension management tools.

– Consumer Goods: Rising demand from retiree demographics.

5. Recommendations

– For SMEs: Invest tax savings in automation, upskilling, or market expansion.

– For Investors: Monitor healthcare, insurance, and SME-focused fintech sectors.

– For Policymakers: Ensure rural areas receive equal access to benefits.

Conclusion

China’s July 2025 reforms aim to boost SME resilience and strengthen retiree welfare, supporting domestic demand amid economic headwinds. While the policies will likely stimulate key sectors, their long-term success depends on balanced fiscal management and inclusive implementation. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/2054151871657699/?__cft__[0]=AZWUXillPUsJIs1-xHaj6YurxyF7-8DAZXopz5iRiydcIs0nXo1wQ-aqduM9rGZ0WqbCLO7X7sjYFqSJ_Ug5nDL-uLCOiclizK6fq3-w5hrbZqS0Dqqj0xvpVx202CBKKIzPJgDzX1Fz3gX1K-DW7fUc2ALMP-oNfysRz4_kkDHCog&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Dual impact of automation displacing jobs while simultaneously creating a demand for highly skilled workers in robotics

China’s manufacturing sector: the dual impact of automation displacing jobs while simultaneously creating a demand for highly skilled workers in robotics.

The Challenge:

– Job Displacement: While specific figures vary, reports and studies consistently indicate that automation, particularly with the rise of industrial robots and “dark factories” (fully automated plants), is leading to significant job losses in China’s manufacturing sector. Some projections suggest millions of jobs could be displaced by 2030. Low-skilled, male, and older workers are often disproportionately affected.

– Robot Engineer Shortage: As China aggressively pursues its “robot revolution” and aims to be a global leader in robotics and AI, there’s a severe shortage of qualified robotics and AI engineers. Reports from early 2025 indicate a massive surge in demand (over 400% year-on-year growth in hiring for humanoid robotics, for example), with companies offering significantly higher salaries (3-4 times the national urban average) to attract talent. This shortage, estimated at around 500,000 for “robot engineers” (a broad category that includes algorithm, mechanical, and software engineers for robotics), could hinder China’s automation goals.

– Skill Mismatch: Even if workers aren’t directly replaced, their existing skills may become obsolete, creating a gap between the current workforce’s capabilities and the demands of automated manufacturing.

Government Initiatives and Strategies for Workforce Transition:

– The Chinese government recognizes these challenges and is implementing a multi-pronged approach to manage the transition:

Investment in Education and Training Programs:

– Reskilling and Upskilling: A primary focus is on providing comprehensive reskilling and upskilling initiatives. This includes promoting STEM education, and offering training in data science, AI development, robotics operation and maintenance, and cybersecurity.

– Vocational Training: There’s a significant push for vocational schools to offer industrial robot-related courses. The number of such schools has dramatically increased over the past decade.

Lifelong Learning: The government is encouraging a culture of continuous learning to empower individuals to adapt and acquire new skills throughout their careers.

Targeted Retraining: Programs are being developed to specifically target workers displaced by automation, particularly in regions heavily impacted by factory modernization.

Strategic Policy Directives:

– “Made in China 2025”: This strategic plan, while controversial internationally, explicitly prioritizes “intelligent manufacturing” and aims to foster technological development, reduce reliance on imported technologies, and upgrade China’s industrial capabilities. Talent development is a core component of this strategy.

– Financial Incentives: The government offers low-interest loans, tax relief, and subsidies to encourage investment in robotics and AI, and to support companies in upgrading their facilities and training their employees.

New Job Categories: Official recognition of new job categories like “industrial robot operators” and “maintenance personnel” helps standardize the industry and vocational training.

Support for Entrepreneurship and Innovation:

– The government is encouraging the creation of new businesses and industries that can absorb displaced workers and foster innovation in the AI-driven economy.

Strengthening Social Safety Nets:

– While not a direct training initiative, expanding social welfare programs is crucial to provide support for unemployed workers during the transition period.

Collaboration:

– There’s an emphasis on fostering collaboration between government, industry, and academia to develop cohesive policies and strategies for a just and equitable transition to an AI-driven economy.

Outlook:

– While the scale of job displacement is considerable, China’s proactive approach to training and reskilling, coupled with its significant investment in the robotics and AI sectors, aims to mitigate the negative social impacts and ensure the country remains competitive in global manufacturing. The success of these initiatives will depend on their scale, effectiveness in reaching affected workers, and the ability to bridge the talent gap in specialized fields like robotics engineering. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1306873634652620/?__cft__[0]=AZVg5SkZMltpGB5C0Anlpsz-tgPLqEpd4zgKDtB5LqK_sfZQ3u9FJbm28Nt6qKuqFX3fVijPyUEOHXtlhyQSySzg2L70TEZ3OP5PmMBmmpWxqbqGPXsls3vHzGQIAqCIUquO0eDX7wmGfrtUD7y5AyvDuWqxaJovtSwYIdKdYWFGyQ&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Chinese modernization

An alternative to Western models of modernization in China.
Chinese modernization include:
– Socialist Modernization under CPC Leadership: It explicitly emphasizes that this modernization is carried out under the leadership of the Communist Party of China and adheres to socialism with Chinese characteristics. Upholding Party leadership is considered a fundamental requirement.
– Huge Population: China’s modernization is unique due to its massive population, aiming for development that benefits all its citizens.
– Common Prosperity for All: A core tenet is the pursuit of “common prosperity,” aiming to reduce wealth disparities and ensure that the benefits of development are shared more equitably among all people.
– Material and Cultural-Ethical Advancement: It encompasses both material progress (economic development, technological innovation) and cultural-ethical advancement, stressing the importance of a thriving culture and moral standards.
– Harmony Between Humanity and Nature: This aspect highlights a commitment to environmental sustainability and ecological conservation, seeking a harmonious coexistence between economic growth and natural preservation.
– Peaceful Development: China emphasizes a path of peaceful development, contrasting its approach with what it describes as the historical expansionism and exploitation associated with some Western modernization models.
– High-Quality Development: The focus is on achieving high-quality development, which implies a shift from simply increasing GDP to more sustainable, innovative, and balanced growth.
– Whole-Process People’s Democracy: While not embracing Western liberal democracy, the concept includes “whole-process people’s democracy,” which the CCP presents as a system that ensures the people’s participation in governance.
– National Rejuvenation: Chinese modernization is intricately linked to the broader goal of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” aiming to restore China to a position of prominence on the world stage.
Historical Context: The concept of modernization has been a long-standing aspiration for China since the 19th century, with early efforts like the Self-Strengthening Movement. After the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, the focus was on building a modern socialist country. The “Four Modernizations” (agriculture, industry, defense, and science and technology) were formally introduced by Zhou Enlai and later became central to Deng Xiaoping’s reform and opening-up policies in the late 1970s. Under Xi Jinping, “Chinese-style modernization” has been further developed and promoted as a distinct and comprehensive pathway.
Impact and Implications: Chinese modernization has led to significant economic growth, poverty reduction, and technological advancements within China. Globally, it is presented as an alternative development model, particularly for developing countries, emphasizing self-determination, mutual benefits, and cooperation. It has also sparked discussions and debates about the nature of modernization, global economic governance, and the future of international relations. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid02HfYTJnLnz34547o5qF5MSmHwFLUVc84XQGqjsQfGC3LCjfMssxGJZSiEEwSYrNY9l?__cft__[0]=AZViBhBV-cHJD_Qz-vpSEzvuQBLWcJJJ5ietNNK1eUWq6okz2rqemruRNiPTONSfs7DUx8Dj4mGd0SmbJz2C06pO4iZUXcUD7r9pheP8bSwHGUfuOdGZ8k8iENypvFUwde4&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

China Standards 2035

“China Standards 2035” is a strategic initiative by the Chinese government that aims to establish China as a global leader in setting technical standards across various industries, particularly in emerging and critical technologies. It’s a more ambitious and deeper program than the “Made in China 2025” initiative, focusing on shaping the rules of global production and exchange.

Here are some key aspects and goals of the “China Standards 2035″ project:

Global Leadership in Standards: The core objective is for China to exert greater influence in international standard-setting bodies (like ISO and IEC) and promote the adoption of Chinese domestic standards globally. This includes strategically placing Chinese officials and technology leaders in these organizations.

Economic and Geopolitical Aspirations: By leading in technical standards, China seeks to gain significant economic benefits through intellectual property rights, licensing fees, and optimizing its manufacturing industry. It also has broader geopolitical goals, aiming to solidify its place in global supply chains and shape the future direction of technological development.

Focus on Emerging Technologies: The initiative places a strong emphasis on setting standards for cutting-edge technologies, including but not limited to:

5G and next-generation communication

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Quantum computing

Internet of Things (IoT)

Electric Vehicles (EVs)

Intelligent connected vehicles

Robotics

Smart manufacturing

Biomedical research

Molecular breeding

Self-driving cars

Domestic Standardization Revamp: The plan involves reforming China’s domestic technical standard-setting system. This includes state-tier standards (fully controlled by the government) and market-tier standards (developed with private industry input). The goal is to streamline the process, promote high-tech innovation, and improve the quality of domestic standards.

Integration with Other Strategies: “China Standards 2035” is closely tied to other national strategies, such as the “Belt and Road Initiative,” where China seeks to promote the international validity of its standards for infrastructure projects. It also aims to align its domestic standards with international ones where beneficial, while also pushing for its own standards to become international norms.

Investment in Research and Development: The strategy calls for establishing world-class standardization research institutions, quality standards laboratories, and innovation bases, along with incentives and subsidies for standards work.

In essence, “China Standards 2035” represents China’s long-term vision to move beyond being just a manufacturing powerhouse to becoming a rule-maker and innovator in the global technological landscape.

———–

The “National Standardization Development Outline” (国家标准化发展纲要) is a pivotal document in China’s overall strategy to become a global leader in technology and industry. Issued in October 2021 by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council, it’s China’s first long-term strategic outline on standardization, setting goals and missions for the country’s standardization efforts from 2025 to 2035.

Here’s a breakdown of its key objectives, features, and impacts:

Core Objectives and Vision:

Elevating Standardization’s Strategic Position: The Outline aims to upgrade the strategic positioning of standardization activities, recognizing standards as fundamental technical support for economic activities and social development, and a crucial aspect of national governance.

Driving High-Quality Development: It’s explicitly designed to promote high-quality development across various industries and contribute to building China into a modernized socialist country.

Global Influence: A central goal is to significantly enhance China’s participation in international standard-setting and promote the adoption of Chinese standards globally, shifting from being a standard-taker to a standard-setter. This directly ties into the “China Standards 2035” initiative.

Domestic System Reform: The Outline seeks to build an “internationally compatible, government-led, enterprise-oriented, and socially participatory standardization management system with Chinese characteristics.” This involves improving both mandatory and recommended national standards, and fostering market-driven standards.

Key Shifts and Transformations by 2025 (and beyond to 2035):

The Outline outlines “Four Transformations” by 2025:

From government-driven to equally government and market-driven: This signifies a greater role for industry and private enterprise in developing standards.

From industry- and trade-driven to economy and society as a whole: Expanding the scope of standardization to cover all aspects of economic and social life, not just industrial production and trade.

From domestically driven to mutual promotion between domestic and international interests: Increasing international cooperation and the global adoption of Chinese standards, while also improving the consistency of national standards with international ones.

From quantity and scale to qualitative benefit: Emphasizing the quality, effectiveness, and impact of standards rather than just the number of standards produced.

Seven Key Missions (among others):

Mutual development of standardization and science and technological innovation: This is a crucial link, aiming to translate R&D breakthroughs into standards quickly and efficiently, particularly in emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, 5G, IoT, and intelligent connected vehicles.

Improvement of industrial standardization: Focusing on upgrading traditional industries and promoting advanced manufacturing through standards.

Standardization for green development: Establishing standards for energy conservation, renewable energy, carbon emissions, environmental protection, and green finance.

Accelerate standardization of urban and rural construction and social construction: Covering areas like smart cities, public services, administrative management, and data security.

Improve standardization and opening to the outside world: Strengthening international cooperation and participation in global standardization bodies.

Solidify the foundation for standardization development: Investing in research institutions, quality standards laboratories, and technological standards innovation bases.

Improvement of the Standard Essential Patent (SEP) system: Strengthening intellectual property protection in standard development.

Impact and Implications:

Geopolitical Instrument: The Outline reinforces China’s view of standards as a geopolitical tool to enhance its global influence, secure supply chains, and reduce reliance on foreign technologies.

Economic Advantage: By setting and promoting its own standards, China aims to gain economic benefits through licensing fees, intellectual property, and a stronger competitive edge for its domestic industries in global markets.

Faster Standard Development: The outline aims to shorten the average period for formulating national standards (to less than 18 months) and accelerate their implementation.

Increased International Engagement: Expect more aggressive Chinese participation in international standards organizations, potentially leading to increased competition or collaboration depending on the technology and political climate.

Opportunities and Challenges for Foreign Businesses: Foreign companies operating in China need to closely track the development and implementation of these standards, as they can significantly impact market access, product design, and compliance requirements. There’s both the potential for new market opportunities by aligning with Chinese standards and the challenge of navigating potentially different or proprietary standards.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid029kJf3PcGintjCj44STyCiSH3gAwzVaXJ5VzxisWAfSUfZpqZ9onYyqgehf3zwDp9l?cft[0]=AZXx1efJpMMnbmSIaJViCRMTkUtn3SJHA0h0huiIY1WWtrpXxa2EZBpg_D-jEwoOj_FwMmq0d8wwTzpUbK8QKp0FphvUJKa0sT8_sd9xYNAi-wodo2xDL7cleTxqA68Rzd1F5YPC_mT8LiK2dT732zYR&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

China’s whitepaper on national security

http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/zfbps_2279/202505/t20250512_894771.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawKgeihleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFLVU1oRDdCNGd2aHBjeEVvAR5kw1eWfSLskDOuQchZwiAf6MjoMcGpl6VGpK7LqxeaorLN5xes8g11QXdrmQ_aem_mapPBw1KvoHRxDacuVL3aw