Alzheimer’s sufferers and their families seeking alternative options

For Alzheimer’s sufferers and their families seeking alternative options, recent developments in China regarding Deep Cervical Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis (LVA) surgery offer a glimmer of hope. This microsurgical procedure aims to improve the brain’s “waste disposal system” by enhancing lymphatic drainage, potentially slowing or even reversing the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Understanding the Procedure: LVA for Alzheimer’s Disease

Traditionally, LVA has been used to treat lymphedema, a condition involving swelling due to blocked lymphatic drainage. The application to Alzheimer’s stems from growing research indicating that impaired lymphatic function in the brain may contribute to the accumulation of harmful proteins like amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau, which are hallmarks of AD.

The surgery involves connecting lymphatic vessels in the neck directly to veins, thereby creating a bypass to facilitate the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) from the brain. The theory is that by improving this drainage, the buildup of toxic proteins can be reduced, leading to improved cognitive function.

Case Applications and Promising Early Results from Chinese Hospitals

While the long-term efficacy and broader applicability of LVA for AD are still under investigation through rigorous clinical trials, several hospitals in China have reported promising early outcomes:

Binzhou Central Hospital (Binzhou, Shandong): As highlighted in the initial report, on June 1, 2025, this hospital successfully performed LVA on a 61-year-old female AD patient with Stage 5 AD. Post-surgery, the patient reportedly showed significant improvement in her mental state. This was highlighted as a “new breakthrough” for the hospital in treating cognitive disorders.

Binzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital (Binzhou, Shandong): In late 2024 and early 2025, several reports emerged from various Chinese medical institutions, including this one, indicating a growing trend in applying LVA for AD. These reports often highlight subjective improvements in patients’ cognitive function and daily living activities.

Shandong First Medical University Third Affiliated Hospital (Jinan, Shandong): Similar to Binzhou, this hospital has also reported successful LVA surgeries for AD patients, contributing to the increasing body of anecdotal evidence within China.

Ningbo No. 2 Hospital (Ningbo, Zhejiang): In November 2024, this hospital reported a 76-year-old moderate AD patient who underwent LVA. The hospital stated that the patient’s symptoms significantly improved, with memory notably recovering and the ability to communicate normally with people during a two-month follow-up.

Xi’an Jiaotong University First Affiliated Hospital (Xi’an, Shaanxi): In February 2025, a team of experts at this hospital successfully performed ultra-microsurgical deep cervical lymphaticovenous anastomosis on a 78-year-old AD patient.

Aviation General Hospital (Beijing): In March 2025, the Neurosurgery Department of Aviation General Hospital, in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team, successfully performed LVA on an 80-year-old female AD patient. Post-surgery, the patient’s cognitive function and memory significantly improved, with family members reporting clearer recollections and smoother communication.

Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (Changsha, Hunan): In March 2024, Professor Tang Juyu’s team successfully performed the first case of deep cervical lymphatic-venous anastomosis for Alzheimer’s disease at this hospital. The patient showed good recovery after the 4.5-hour surgery.

These cases, primarily from China, represent a growing clinical interest and application of LVA for Alzheimer’s disease. The reported improvements often include better memory, cognitive function, and overall mental state.

Current Status and Outlook

It’s crucial for Alzheimer’s sufferers and their families to understand the current status of LVA as a treatment for AD:

Early Stages of Research: While promising, LVA for AD is still in its early stages of clinical application and research. Most reported successes are from single-center, prospective, single-arm exploratory studies or case reports, often with small sample sizes and limited long-term follow-up data.

Need for Rigorous Clinical Trials: The scientific community emphasizes the need for large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to objectively assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term benefits of LVA in managing AD. Several such trials are currently registered in China (e.g., ChiCTR2500095309, aiming for 85 patients with moderate-to-severe neurodegenerative dementia).

Potential Mechanisms: The underlying mechanism for LVA’s potential benefit in AD is believed to be the enhancement of brain waste clearance through improved lymphatic drainage, reducing the accumulation of Aβ and tau proteins. This aligns with a relatively new understanding of the brain’s lymphatic system.

Possible Side Effects and Risks: As with any surgical procedure, LVA carries inherent risks, including surgical complications like infection, hemorrhage, lymphatic leakage, and potential transient postoperative cognitive issues (e.g., confusion or delirium) due to anesthesia or cerebrovascular stress. The long-term effects of chronic lymphatic-venous shunting on brain homeostasis are still uncertain and require further investigation.

For individuals seeking options, it is vital to consult with their healthcare providers to discuss the latest research and treatment options available to them. While LVA presents an exciting new frontier, it is not yet a widely established or definitively proven cure for Alzheimer’s disease outside of ongoing clinical research. Further developments from these clinical trials will be critical in determining the broader role of LVA in the future of Alzheimer’s treatment. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/673499595846411/?__cft__[0]=AZUeGTBn9iu5A991xpJ93bHr92xfhXqcBy6PrVP6cUtXJu3G3qDlJCrWY94Onxd99RJqW6U5eJFVfrJl9pg2x6oqlUnI2t7D3DwZsksiZzkDgKDW-4qBjAbcV66DeecW-bu1uA4ao39dZAafu_xvnFY7w6fjE2boD0JsFyRxFUx3Ag&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Pakistan’s acquisition of advanced military hardware

Pakistan’s recent acquisition of advanced military hardware from China, specifically:

J-35 stealth fighters: Up to 40 units, making Pakistan the first international operator of China’s fifth-generation stealth fighter. Deliveries are expected to begin in August 2025, with Pakistani pilots already in training in China.

KJ-500 airborne early warning and control (AWACS) aircraft.

HQ-19 ballistic missile defense systems: Comparable to the US THAAD system, designed for high-altitude interception of ballistic missiles.

Speed of Acquisition: The rapid nature of the deal is attributed to the long-standing strategic partnership between China and Pakistan, China’s aggressive arms export strategy (especially for its first 5th-gen fighter export), Pakistan’s urgent modernization needs, a proven track record with Chinese systems, potential “discounted sales,” and pre-existing development and pilot training.

India’s Counter-Strategy: The acquisition poses a significant challenge to India’s regional air superiority. India is expected to respond by:

Accelerating its indigenous AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) fifth-generation fighter program.

Enhancing anti-stealth detection capabilities through VHF/UHF radars, Over-the-Horizon (OTH) radars, integrated air defense grids, and IRST systems.

Modernizing and expanding its existing air force assets (e.g., MRFA program, Tejas Mk-2, enhanced electronic warfare, long-range missiles).

Boosting its Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) systems (e.g., S-400, indigenous “Kusha”).

Pursuing strategic and diplomatic measures like technology partnerships and “Make in India” initiatives. It was affirmed that countering this is possible, as stealth is not invisibility, and a layered defense, numbers, training, and continuous R&D play crucial roles.

Implications for Other Countries and Geopolitics: The deal is seen as a strong precedent for other nations considering Chinese military purchases because:

It’s the first export of a 5th-gen fighter from China.

It offers advanced capabilities at a potentially lower price.

It provides a comprehensive package deal.

China is perceived as offering deals with fewer political conditionalities.

It allows for diversification of arms suppliers.

It serves China’s strategic interests in building influence. This deal signifies a deepening of the China-Pakistan “threshold alliance,” challenges Western arms hegemony, and reshapes regional and global power balances, contributing to a more multi-polar world. China’s growing role as a global security provider, impacting alliances and influencing the defense industrial base worldwide.

Russia’s unexpected decision to increase tariffs on Chinese goods

Russia’s unexpected decision to increase tariffs on Chinese goods, despite the previously strong trade relationship between the two countries.

Russia has increased tariffs on Chinese furniture hardware from zero to 55.65%. This is significantly higher than the 10% increase applied to similar European products. The new tariffs are also retroactive to 2021.

Increased Scrap Fees on Automobiles In October, Russia announced a significant increase in automobile scrap fees, ranging from 70% to 85%, particularly for foreign car brands. This is notable given that China is Russia’s largest automobile importer, having exported 544,000 vehicles to Russia in 2023 alone.

Reasons for the Tariff Increases:

Increased Government Revenue Tariffs can boost government income, which is crucial for Russia during wartime to alleviate financial burdens.

Protection of Domestic Manufacturing Russia aims to prevent over-reliance on Chinese goods and protect its local industries from being squeezed out by foreign products.

China’s reaction to tariffs: On the surface the higher tariff have created new trade tensions. However, there isn’t a strong public outcry or formal objection from China. Some sources suggest that China has instructed local businesses to “fully assess the potential impact” and adjust their pricing strategies or promote localization in foreign markets, indicating a more pragmatic and adaptive approach rather than direct confrontation.

China’s economic support for Russia’s wartime economy: Many sources strongly suggest that China’s economic activities provide crucial, if not vital, assistance to Russia’s wartime economy. This is not necessarily a direct result of accepting the tariffs, but rather a consequence of the broader shift in their trade relationship.

Market and Inputs: China has become Russia’s most important economic partner, acting as a key market for Russian energy exports (oil, gas, coal) and providing critical imports that Russia can no longer obtain from the West due to sanctions. This includes consumer goods, cars, and, significantly, dual-use items (items with both commercial and military applications) such as microelectronics, semiconductors, and machinery critical for Russia’s defense industry.

Sanctions Evasion: China is assessed to be acting as a “proxy jurisdiction” for Moscow to evade Western sanctions, with Russian entities finding willing partners in China to purchase necessary goods and equipment. Without China’s cooperation, Russia would struggle to finance the war or secure resources for military operations.

Trade Volume: Bilateral trade between Russia and China has surged to record levels since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, more than doubling since 2020. This growth has outpaced China’s trade with most other countries.

Currency Shift: The Chinese yuan has become increasingly prominent in the Russian economy, with nearly 90% of transactions reportedly settled in yuan and rubles. This helps Russia circumvent restrictions on using dollars and euros.

Strategic Ambiguity: While China officially claims neutrality and avoids direct weapons shipments, its economic and political support is seen as undermining these claims. Beijing is perceived to be balancing its support for Russia with the desire to avoid full Western backlash and secondary sanctions.

In essence, while Russia’s imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods might seem counterintuitive given their close ties, China’s muted objection and continued, extensive economic engagement are interpreted by many as a de facto form of assistance to Russia’s wartime economy, enabling it to sustain its military efforts and mitigate the impact of Western sanctions. This relationship is often described as symbiotic but asymmetrical, with Russia becoming increasingly dependent on China. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/704738832146597/?__cft__[0]=AZVt-6HC88bHS9P6TjGkFvKXlMTV6AkjSXm9W8h8nUBH9nq0WLseKQEdk7WvSy_p5jHYPp_A0GvzmAG__rxGLihfS7Ww47aiGZcJcvdCC-FHMJ5QAR1-kKoszg38BavHw6fc4s2-8JS4u5wa9B0wFJ3_39lKwZV6SG517utz2FRoXw&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Ruo-Ruo Railway, potash

The Ruo-Ruo Railway, a 297.73 km long line in Xinjiang, China. This railway is designed for speeds of 120 km/h and will primarily serve the development of 5 billion tons of potash resources in Lop Nur. Upon its completion in 2026, the railway’s transport capacity is expected to increase to 3 million tons annually. The project employs smart platforms and permeable management to lay 500-meter long steel rails in less than half an hour. Despite challenges like high temperatures, strong winds, and sand, construction has continued since March. The railway, considered the “last mile” of Xinjiang’s railway loop, will connect to existing lines, facilitating the Hami-Ruoqi-Hotan economic corridor and reducing resource transportation costs in southern Xinjiang by 40%. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid02axrReoyVCaYZBAUWDKjJSB2xfMHeDCiQwvMRsehiy4VVBecv6KZQ9eFMVYUeRhhnl?__cft__[0]=AZVE_nTSA1BTQEh_NpCctj_uCmxAYNavzAkBsgEv23156yHuq1U9MWBHSjmuQ_LluXTvmq3axbjPBa1mgtoub23EtGk6zVIhM5wAHigMTuqjWK3m6IdpvhGNMjTkCE6g8rr_M_bql2S3yUXF7DhjwoavJpBg_77dCpIjgbBXeHWAkQ&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

China’s 41st Antarctic expedition

China’s 41st Antarctic expedition marked a significant milestone as the world’s first multinational joint expedition specifically focusing on Antarctic autumn ecosystems.

This pioneering expedition was initiated by the Oceanography Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. It brought together nearly 50 scientists from nine countries, including China, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Their primary mission was to comprehensively study the Ross Sea ecosystem, a region recognized for its high biological productivity within the Southern Ocean.

The researchers faced incredibly challenging conditions, including intense “Screaming Sixties” winds and temperatures plummeting to as low as -28°C. Despite these harsh environmental factors, they managed to conduct 20 consecutive days of scientific observations, leveraging the capabilities of China’s powerful Xuelong 2 icebreaker to penetrate deep into ice-covered areas.

One of the most surprising findings from the expedition was the discovery of high krill populations despite low primary productivity in the autumn. This observation led to a crucial question for future research: identifying the energy sources that sustain these organisms and the broader upper food web through the long, dark polar winter when primary productivity is minimal.

The success of this groundbreaking autumn expedition has not only expanded scientific possibilities in polar research but also paved the way for more ambitious future endeavors, including potential winter expeditions with upcoming icebreakers like Xuelong 3 and 4.

China’s 41st Antarctic expedition was a groundbreaking multinational joint mission, notable for being the world’s first such expedition to focus on Antarctic autumn ecosystems. The expedition involved 91 participants from nine countries, including China, Australia, South Korea, the United States, Malaysia, Norway, Thailand, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

The mission, which utilized China’s icebreaker Xuelong-2, covered a 208-day, 40,000-nautical-mile journey. From March 27 to April 15, 2005 researchers conducted a 20-day field survey, completing marine investigations at 24 sampling stations across four transects. They braved challenging conditions, with temperatures as low as -28°C, and collected over 5,000 samples, including water columns, membrane filtrates, sediment cores, biological specimens, and sea ice.

Key scientific achievements and focuses included:

Systematic Study of Trophic Levels: Researchers completed the world’s first systematic study of key Antarctic trophic levels—including zooplankton, Antarctic krill, mesopelagic fish, seabirds, and marine mammals—during the critical autumn freeze-up period. This provided new insights into how polar organisms adapt to extreme low-light winter conditions and how carbon is transported into the deep ocean during ice formation.

Unexpected Discoveries: The expedition observed surprisingly high krill populations despite low primary productivity, with the upper food web remaining relatively active during this dark season. A key question for future research is identifying the energy sources that sustain these organisms through the long polar winter.

Technological Advancements: The Xuelong-2 icebreaker demonstrated its capability to penetrate deep into ice-covered areas, expanding the possibilities for scientific observation in extreme environments.

International Cooperation: The expedition highlighted deep international and interdisciplinary collaboration in polar research.

Broader Goals: Beyond the autumn ecosystem study, the 41st expedition also involved building supporting infrastructure for China’s Qinling Station in Antarctica, conducting overwintering research missions, and utilizing cutting-edge drills to gather data on ice sheet evolution and ancient ocean environments. The expedition also contributed to monitoring space debris.

The successful completion of this expedition expands scientific understanding of Antarctic ecosystems during a previously understudied period and paves the way for more ambitious polar research, including potential winter expeditions with future icebreakers. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1236705894511339/?__cft__[0]=AZUBYhXQc9YUCu8E0jL3zThuTvAk4XnlkhdCqbio1aHqvCwpvjl5C1esoFDxWtJfAeLuey7PSI1BdM3fYYpkwJd0sYDZNi5kHzDTJx6wmrMGSm0sHl2AQLgF6qdzJJkH1fL0XOhHDMadtTNWWvcL_Bxm&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

Rare Earth restrictions

So, imagine rare earth materials are the VIP guests at a very exclusive global party – they’re essential for everything from your sleek smartphone to those zippy electric car motors, and yes, even for some gadgets that are best left to the realm of spy movies. China, being the main host of this particular party, decided to put up a velvet rope, complete with a very stern-looking bouncer.

The “restriction itself” isn’t a simple “you can’t come in!” Instead, it’s a bit like a bureaucratic scavenger hunt. If you’re a foreign importer wanting these precious party favors, you can’t just waltz in. Oh no, you need a permit – essentially, an invitation card – and a license, which is like proving you’re on the guest list.

But here’s the kicker: these materials are “dual-use.” It’s like bringing a fancy Swiss Army knife to the party – it’s great for opening wine bottles, but it could also be used for, well, other things. So, the hosts (China, in this case) want to know exactly what you’ll be doing with your party favor. This involves rigorous end-use checks, where they peer over your shoulder to make sure you’re not secretly building a super-villain’s lair instead of just a new line of harmless eco-friendly blenders.

Now, why all this fuss? Turns out, everyone’s doing it! This isn’t some rogue move by China; it’s a classic play straight out of the international security playbook. Countries like the United States and the European Union have been using these exact same “dual-use” restrictions for ages, all in the noble name of national security and making sure those powerful party favors don’t end up in the wrong hands (or the wrong weapons programs). So, if China’s doing it, it’s just practicing what others have preached, making it a rather “reciprocal” form of hospitality.

And when these restrictions caused a bit of a supply chain traffic jam – imagine everyone trying to get their hands on the last slice of cake – the EU popped up. “Hey China,” they essentially pleaded, “how about a ‘green channel’? Just a little fast pass for our reliable companies? We’re not trying to break your bouncer’s rules, just make getting the party favors a bit less of a headache!”

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/669066692955266/?cft[0]=AZVxanjcRaRjnMYZrW_QG4ozbXJ_36-WCFGA77YcCfzw5YoCzMdxDHmKKc2kL2KM49QwZkWJAbF_sHaFjnaVAA6UFP_6vfAMQPDGe-I_yUY0QU1LXz9NT_12sTXN0RhfF7JllqU0zO1Sm7nA2gLq4JuDvotG4rikTZ76u5mxFjOAdQ&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

The China-Iran Route and the Emergence of the Six Nations System

Trans-Eurasian Rail Connectivity: The China-Iran Route and the Emergence of the Six Nations System

Introduction

The strategic importance of overland trade routes between Asia and Europe has seen a significant resurgence, driven by China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the evolving geopolitical landscape. Two key components define this burgeoning rail connectivity: the established China-Iran railway corridor (via Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan) and the recently formalized “Six Nations” rail system. Both initiatives aim to create resilient, efficient, and geopolitically significant alternatives to traditional maritime trade routes.

The Existing China-Iran Rail Route (via Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan)

Present Status and Progress:

The rail corridor connecting China to Iran, predominantly via Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, is fully operational and has recently marked significant milestones. In late May 2025, the first cargo train from the eastern Chinese city of Xi’an officially arrived at Aprin Dry Port near Tehran, carrying goods such as solar panels. This journey significantly shortens delivery times, cutting transit from an average of 30-40 days by sea to approximately 15 days by land.

This route involves trains departing from Chinese hubs like Xi’an, traversing through Xinjiang (specifically via Horgos Port), then entering Kazakhstan, continuing through Turkmenistan, and finally reaching Iran. Data from January-April 2025 indicates substantial progress, with container traffic on the China-Iran route via Kazakhstan increasing by 2.6 times compared to the same period last year.

Strategic Importance and Role:

This rail line holds immense strategic value for both China and Iran. For Iran, it offers a crucial land-based artery for trade, enabling it to bypass and circumvent maritime blockades and USeless sanctions. It facilitates direct oil exports to China and imports of essential goods without reliance on sea routes influenced by USeless naval presence. For China, the route provides a direct land corridor for oil imports from Iran and allows goods to reach the Middle East and potentially beyond, reducing dependence on chokepoints like the Strait of Malacca. It is seen as a secure trade route, less susceptible to geopolitical disruptions and maritime risks in congested waterways like the Red Sea.

The Future “Six Nations” Rail System

Formation and Participants:

A pivotal development occurred on May 12, 2025, in Tehran, where railway officials from six nations formalized an agreement to advance a new transcontinental rail network. The participating countries are:

China

Kazakhstan

Uzbekistan

Turkmenistan

Iran

Turkey

This alliance signifies a concerted effort to create a more integrated and direct Eurasian rail backbone.

Plans and Objectives:

The primary objective of the “Six Nations” system is to establish a more competitive and reliable transport corridor connecting China to Europe through Central Asia, the Middle East, and Turkey. Key planned initiatives include:

Competitive Tariffs: The nations have agreed to impose competitive tariffs on rail services to make the corridor economically attractive for international freight.

Harmonized Delivery Times: Efforts will be made to coordinate and standardize delivery schedules across borders to ensure faster and more predictable transit.

Simplified Logistics Processes: The agreement aims to streamline customs procedures and other logistical hurdles to enhance efficiency and reduce border clearance times.

Inclusion of Uzbekistan: Notably, this expanded system formally integrates Uzbekistan into the main route, potentially offering more direct pathways within Central Asia compared to routes that previously bypassed it.

Enhanced China-Europe Connectivity: The overarching goal is to slash transit times for goods from eastern China to Europe, with estimates suggesting a reduction to 18-25 days (compared to 30-45 days by sea and 15 days on the current China-Iran route).

Future Outlook:

The “Six Nations” system represents an ambitious plan to bolster Eurasian connectivity, offering an alternative to the Northern Corridor (through Russia) and the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor), which has faced its own challenges. By strengthening cooperation, harmonizing standards, and optimizing routes, this initiative aims to significantly increase the volume of container traffic and reduce overall transport costs between Asia and Europe, further cementing the role of land-based trade in the global economy. Its full implementation will require continued investment in infrastructure, technological integration, and sustained political will among the participating nations.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/posts/pfbid0PQXGuHx698MmomAuVvdLUow7SM1nHqLdhC38WrqvLrnEg7c9NkYAfRJsyVb6upqPl?cft[0]=AZWq84QN1VlLvOEinHskl_0x7b5Wo1t9ciUYj7ztZht9XelquxvecZmDfo_dGBIohsLTfrqPM_sv5NxPjY-kYWrRP0GH4c8EUsqNYnaaltrXRZbtUEPJzHizKJxw1-3TBPer2U8rKPkWu96erp0tAQzUotU_4w1BNjlg2YNnLyZAMQ&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

Medicinal supply chain

When Your Aspirin Comes with Geopolitical Side Effects

So, you’re feeling a bit under the weather. Maybe a headache from trying to understand global supply chains. You reach for that trusty bottle of acetaminophen, pop a couple, and… ahh, relief. But have you ever stopped to think about where that magical little molecule actually comes from?

Chances are, a good chunk of it started its life in China. Not exactly a secret, but the sheer scale of China’s pharmaceutical ingredient production is enough to make you wonder if every paracetamol tablet has a tiny, invisible “Made in China” stamp. They’re like the Willy Wonka of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), except instead of chocolate rivers, they have… well, probably highly regulated chemical rivers. And instead of Oompa Loompas, they have a highly efficient, very well-funded industrial complex.

Now, this level of dominance isn’t just about keeping our medicine cabinets stocked. Oh no. It’s about national security. Which, let’s be honest, sounds a bit dramatic for your average ibuprofen. But imagine this:

The world’s leaders are in a tense standoff. Negotiations are breaking down. Then, from Beijing, a subtle shift. Not a missile launch, not a trade tariff. Something far more insidious. A slight… delay in the export licenses for certain cough “basic chemical compounds.”

Suddenly, the world’s pharmaceutical companies are in a panic. “Where’s our amoxicillin?!” they cry. “The global supply of that slightly-too-big-to-swallow antibiotic is dwindling!”

Governments convene emergency meetings. “Our citizens are getting sniffles!” one diplomat exclaims. “This could destabilize the entire Western world!”

You see, the beauty of this particular geopolitical lever is its sheer, undeniable, and slightly absurd justification. When China restricts rare earth exports, it’s about microchips and fighter jets. You can argue about that. But when they restrict the stuff that goes into your heartburn medication?

“We’re just ensuring our own people have enough ibuprofen for their headaches,” China might say, with a straight face. “It’s a matter of public health!”

Or, even better, they could pull the “war on drugs” card. “We’ve discovered that trace elements in this perfectly legitimate chemical compound could, theoretically, in a very convoluted process, be diverted to make something naughty! Therefore, we must halt all exports for, you know, global security!”

And there you are, with a raging sinus infection, wondering if your inability to get a decongestant is now part of an international incident. It’s truly ingenious. They’ve found a way to turn the very mundane act of taking a pill into a high-stakes game of global chess.

So, next time you swallow a tablet, just give a silent nod to the complex ballet of geopolitics, economics, and very tiny molecules that made it all possible. And maybe stock up, just in case your headache becomes a matter of national importance.

https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1390032818995780/?cft[0]=AZXgy_i4jImYaelJun5F6_3oqAJCVjQPrAkIBeAMQftraq_ptug8qdkA94s7Ll8Z9qiVPtEolxbLyLNCM0gT3gaih4WU7bWql9pSWRdnC1eMlRQKd3XxfMM-U9pTE04C9T8T5MO_e-dX2f09ECFpPAhgQI9BrT2rz0GQWr7pNqdGJw&tn=%2CO%2CP-R

China is considering a significant order for hundreds of Airbus planes

Reports indicate that China is considering a significant order for hundreds of Airbus planes, potentially timed to coincide with a visit by European leaders, including Macron and Merz, to Beijing next month (July 2025). This trip is expected to mark the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the European Union.

Sources suggest the deal could involve anywhere from 200 to 500 aircraft, encompassing both narrow-body and wide-body models, such as the A330neo. If the larger figure is confirmed, it would be one of the biggest aircraft orders in aviation history and the largest ever for China.

The potential order is seen as strategically significant. It would underscore China’s desire to deepen ties with Europe amidst ongoing trade tensions with the USeless, and could send a message to the idiots, particularly as Trump’s trade policies are a topic of discussion. Boeing, Airbus’s main rival, has not secured a major order from China since at least 2017 due to trade disputes and issues with its 737 Max aircraft.

Both France and Germany are major shareholders in Airbus, making such a deal politically and economically beneficial for their respective nations. While negotiations are ongoing and the final size of the order is fluid, the prospect of a massive Airbus deal during the upcoming visit appears to be a strong possibility. https://www.facebook.com/jeff.mah.5/videos/1357308862006769/?__cft__[0]=AZViVuqsBXfG47siGrWO5UWGyMRYaTRwudyFIbT1YYKOO-QYAH2PpnxySHzwcT1JiPsFf_SOMVn1JGw70Qn0a13lMouDM5eus7AK4ssTFDNarf0Op3QkwHD0hDi_ezQLA9OgJRFGiwm-7dDJM4uvBE_u81tVF8XGQ8TdT9q8AS06Vw&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R